The hot spots conjecture for simply connected planar domains

On smooth flat shapes without holes, the lasting hot and cold spots lie on the edge.

1 paper September 24, 2026 Explained by AI

Heat an insulated flat plate unevenly and wait; the temperature settles into one slowly fading pattern. The hot spots conjecture says that pattern is hottest and coldest on the edge. Counterexamples exist for shapes with holes. This paper proves a strict form for every smooth shape without holes: the pattern has no flat point inside at all.

First step
1975
Jeffrey Rauch, problem raised
Significance
Major
It settles the smooth simply connected planar case of a well-known problem, where proofs needed symmetry or special shapes.
Trust
Formal proof listed
Field
Partial differential equations
1 paper

The explanation

Take a thin metal plate with insulated edges, so no heat escapes. Heat it unevenly and wait. The temperature evens out, but slowly, and for a long time it keeps one basic shape. The question is where the hottest and coldest points of that lasting shape sit. The hot spots conjecture says they sit on the edge, never inside.

A rectangle 2 units long and 1 unit wide shows the idea. Its slowest-fading temperature shape is cos(πx/2), which runs from hot at one short end to cold at the other. Its decay rate is π²/4, about 2.47. The next shape across the width decays at π², about 9.87, so the lengthwise one lasts longest. Its hottest and coldest points lie on the two short ends. A rectangle has corners, so it is only a warm-up for the smooth shapes in this paper.

A round plate is smooth. There the lasting shape is a Bessel function times cos θ. For a disc of radius 1, its decay rate is about 3.39. It grows steadily from the centre outward, so again the extremes lie on the rim. A disc also has a twist: the same shape turned by 90 degrees fades at exactly the same rate. Then there is a whole family of lasting shapes, not just one, and each must be checked.

In mathematical terms, these lasting shapes are eigenfunctions for the first positive Neumann eigenvalue. Jeffrey Rauch raised the problem in 1975. It is false in general. In 1999, Krzysztof Burdzy and Wendelin Werner built a flat counterexample with two holes. Burdzy later needed only one hole. So the conjecture is about shapes with no holes. Proofs existed only for special classes. These include convex shapes with two mirror symmetries, the so-called lip domains, and every triangle.

This paper proves a strict form for every smooth flat shape without holes. Every lasting shape has a nonzero slope at every inside point. So it has no peak, no valley and no saddle point inside. Its maximum and minimum lie on the edge. This holds for every member of the family when there is more than one.

The single difficulty is that the slope has no preferred direction. In a rectangle you can watch the slope along its length. A general shape gives you nothing like that. The insulated edge does give one fact: at the boundary, the slope runs along the edge, never across it. The paper builds an energy that is zero exactly for slopes of lasting shapes. It then reweights the boundary values in a way that keeps that energy zero. If some inside point had zero slope, these reweightings would create too many independent lasting shapes. That breaks a limit the paper proves on how many there can be, so no such point exists.

The result needs a smooth edge, so it does not cover shapes with corners, such as polygons. It also stays in two dimensions and assumes no holes. The counterexamples show the claim fails for some shapes with holes.

How sure is this? A computer proof checker called Lean has checked a formal version of the main theorem. The slope is never zero inside, for every lasting shape in the family. A tool called Comparator matches it against a fixed reference statement. No specialist review of the paper has been published.

What it doesn't show. This does not cover shapes with corners, shapes with holes, or higher dimensions.

Where it came from

This result comes from an unreleased OpenAI model, published in the openai/math release on 6 October 2026.

Hype check

Lean checks a formal version of the main theorem. The result is limited to smooth flat shapes without holes, and no specialist review is published.

Words used

Neumann eigenfunction
A temperature pattern on an insulated plate that keeps its shape while fading at a fixed rate.
Eigenvalue
The fixed fading rate of such a pattern.
Critical point
A point where the slope is zero, such as a peak, a valley or a saddle.
Simply connected
A shape with no holes.
Multiplicity
How many independent patterns share the same fading rate.

The original paper

All quoted lines (5)

  1. The theorem imposes no convexity or symmetry condition.
    Strict hot spots and absence of interior critical points on smooth simply connected planar domains Back to text
  2. The nonvanishing-gradient conclusion is stronger than (…), since it also rules out interior saddle points.
    Strict hot spots and absence of interior critical points on smooth simply connected planar domains Back to text
  3. The difficulty is to control the gradient without a preferred direction in the domain.
    Strict hot spots and absence of interior critical points on smooth simply connected planar domains Back to text
  4. We use that constraint through a nonnegative quadratic form whose nullspace consists exactly of first-positive eigenfunction gradients.
    Strict hot spots and absence of interior critical points on smooth simply connected planar domains Back to text
  5. A critical point would thus produce too many eigenfunction gradients, contradicting the planar multiplicity bound or boundary uniqueness.
    Strict hot spots and absence of interior critical points on smooth simply connected planar domains Back to text

Other sources

  1. J. Rauch, “Lecture #1. Five problems: An introduction to the qualitative theory of partial differential equations”, Partial Differential Equations and Related Topics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 446, Springer (1975), 355–369
  2. K. Burdzy and W. Werner, “A counterexample to the “hot spots” conjecture”, Annals of Mathematics 149 (1999), 309–317
  3. K. Burdzy, “The hot spots problem in planar domains with one hole”, Duke Mathematical Journal 129(3) (2005), 481–502
  4. D. Jerison and N. Nadirashvili, “The “hot spots” conjecture for domains with two axes of symmetry”, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 13(4) (2000), 741–772
  5. R. Atar and K. Burdzy, “On Neumann eigenfunctions in lip domains”, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 17(2) (2004), 243–265
  6. C. Judge and S. Mondal, “Euclidean triangles have no hot spots”, Annals of Mathematics 191 (2020), 167–211
  7. openai/math release notes (2026): model provenance and review status manuscripts and supporting proof artifacts produced by an internal OpenAI model